Waddell McCollum v. Hubert Peterkin, No. 18-1982 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1982 WADDELL MCCOLLUM; LENA MCCOLLUM, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. HUBERT PETERKIN; TIMOTHY RUGG; SAMUEL MORANT; TIMOTHY KAVANAUGH; STANLEY DAVIS; HOKE COUNTY; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3; JOHN DOE #4; JOHN DOE #5, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:17-cv-00965-WO-JLW) Submitted: February 27, 2019 Decided: May 1, 2019 Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Waddell McCollum, Lena McCollum, Appellants Pro Se. Bradley O. Wood, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Waddell and Lena McCollum appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and related state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCollum v. Peterkin, No. 1:17-cv00965-WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 3 & July 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.