D.M. Bandara v. Dan Mann, No. 18-1903 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1903 DR. D.M. INDIKA BANDARA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAN MANN, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members, AAE Director; JAMES A. COMPTON, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members (Chairman); CAROL FOWLER, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; F. XAVIER STARKES, Esq, RichlandLexington Airport District Commission Members; WILLIAM DUKES, a/k/a Bill, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; JERROD F. HOWARD, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; RICHARD MCINTYRE, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; DAN P. BELL, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; HAZEL L. BENNETT, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; D. J. CARSON, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; DAVID N. JORDAN, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; JAMES L. WHITMIRE, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; DUANE COOPER, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; LYNNE DOUGLAS, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-03212-TLW) Submitted: December 18, 2018 Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Decided: December 20, 2018 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. D.M. Indika Bandara, Appellant Pro Se. Carey Michael Ayer, DAVIS FRAWLEY, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: D.M. Indika Bandara appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her complaint raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-7 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bandara v. Mann, No. 3:16-cv-03212-TLW (D.S.C. filed June 6 & entered June 7, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.