Victor Perkins v. John Ashcroft, No. 18-1821 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1821 VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN ASHCROFT; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.; LORETTA LYNCH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:18-ct-03014-D) Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018 Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor Bernard Perkins appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Perkins v. Ashcroft, No. 5:18ct-03014-D (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.