Palomo Farms LLC/Hemport v. U.S. Drug Enforcement, No. 18-1766 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1766 PALOMO FARMS LLC/HEMPORT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (4:17-cv-00169-BO) Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: April 5, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elaine B. Wilson, LAW OFFICE OF ELAINE B. WILSON, P.L.L.C., Clayton, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., United States Attorney, Joshua B. Royster, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Gordon James, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Palomo Farms LLC/Hemport appeals the district court’s order dismissing its complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Palomo Farms LLC/Hemport v. U.S. Drug Enf., No. 4:17-cv-00169-BO (E.D.N.C. June 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.