Jupiter Wilson, Sr. v. City of Chesapeake, No. 18-1462 (4th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1462 JUPITER DENNELL WILSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, in its Official Capacity, Defendant - Appellee, and CITY OF CHESAPEAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT; BATTALION CHIEF CARL ACKISS, in his official capacity; FIRE FIGHTER WILLIAM COPELAND, in his official capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Douglas E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (2:16-cv-00301-DEM) Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa A. Hamann, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., appeals the magistrate judge’s * orders granting the City of Chesapeake summary judgment on his discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2018), and denying Wilson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Wilson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:16-cv00301-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2018 & April 17, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(2) (2012). 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
