Roderick Hall v. Sprint Corporation, No. 18-1309 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1309 RODERICK JERMAINE HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SPRINT CORPORATION, d/b/a Sprint, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00024-RJC-DSC) Submitted: July 10, 2018 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Jermaine Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: July 19, 2018 PER CURIAM: Roderick Jermaine Hall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hall’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Hall has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.