William Taccino v. Commissioner, Social Security, No. 18-1294 (4th Cir. 2018)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1294 WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES; PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD TRUMP; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR JIM JUSTICE; STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendants - Appellees. No. 18-1295 WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES; PRESIDENT OF THE U. S. A. DONALD TRUMP; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR JIM JUSTICE; STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02112-GLR) Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: June 28, 2018 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: William Anthony Taccino appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Comm’r Soc. Sec., No. 1:14-cv-02112-GLR (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2018; Feb. 23, 2018). We deny Taccino’s motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.