Redmond Howard v. Edward Russo, No. 18-1244 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1244 REDMOND HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD RUSSO; JORDAN GEIBEL; SCOTT HAMILTON, Defendants - Appellees, and JEFFREY FLOYD; KAREN FLOYD; JONATHAN SCHMEDEL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03948-GLR) Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 30, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Redmond Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Jordan Geibel, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Redmond Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order addressing the various motions Howard filed in a pending civil suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Howard seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.