Brian Hill v. EOUSA, No. 18-1160 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1160 BRIAN DAVID HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, EOUSA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DOJ, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:17-cv-00027-JLK-RSB) Submitted: June 26, 2018 Decided: July 24, 2018 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian David Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl Thornton Sloan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brian David Hill appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Hill’s action seeking relief under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Exec. Office for U.S. Attorneys, No. 4:17-cv-00027-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.