Percy Tucker v. Jefferson Sessions III, No. 17-7392 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7392 PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ LINDSLEY, Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. No. 17-7393 PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ LINDSLEY, Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03307-D) Submitted: October 2, 2018 Decided: October 16, 2018 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Percy James Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Percy J. Tucker appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil complaint, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tucker v. Lynch, No. 5:15-ct-03307-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2018; Oct. 4, 2017; Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3