Mario Hairston v. US, No. 17-6923 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6923 MARIO HAIRSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00061-JPB-JES) Submitted: October 30, 2017 Decided: November 17, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mario Hairston, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mario Hairston appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Hairston’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. United States, No. 2:17-cv00061-JPB-JES (N.D.W. Va. June 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.