My'Ka El v. R. Reese, No. 17-2300 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2300 MY’KA EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. REESE, Officer, Defendant - Appellee, and CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; M. SULLIVAN, Officer; S. SELOGY, Officer; MEYERS, Officer; AGAPE, Officer; K. S. KODAD, Officer; ISSAC, Officer; AIRTONE, Lieutenant; S. MOBLEY; T. MOORE; T. WILSON; J. FLETCHER, Officer; J. PARKER; P. MOORE; L.B. DIGGS; B. BUTLER; NURSE GREEN, Sergeant; M. W. WOMBLE; M. T. RETORT; B. SCAREY; T. CASTANO; STOUTS, Sergeant; R. MONROE; J. H. FRISON; R. BURNETT; BRADON JOLLY, North Carolina State Trooper; W. L. CANTER; COOPER JERRELL, Mecklenburg County Sheriff; EASON; STREET, Sergeant; GANT, Sergeant; HOOD, Officer; R. CHAPMAN, Mecklenburg County Magistrate, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK) Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 16, 2018 Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. My’Ka El, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Edward Peterson, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: My’Ka El appeals the district court’s February 28, 2017, order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. El previously appealed the district court’s order, and we affirmed the judgment on appeal. El v. Reese, 694 F. App’x 160 (4th Cir. 2017) (No. 17-6397). Because we previously have affirmed the district court’s order, we dismiss the instant appeal as duplicative and untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.