Carston Woodson v. US, No. 17-1816 (4th Cir. 2018)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1816 CARSTON CARRELL WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 17-1817 CARSTON CARRELL WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 17-1818 CARSTON CARRELL WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 17-1819 CARSTON CARRELL WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 17-1821 CARSTON CARRELL WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. 2 No. 17-1822 CARSTON CARRELL WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 17-1825 CARSTON CARRELL WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 17-1826 CARSTON CARRELL WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. 3 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00185-REP; 3:17-cv-00186-REP; 3:17-cv-00187-REP; 3:17-cv-00188-REP; 3:17-cv-00189-REP; 3:17-cv-00190-REP; 3:17-cv-00191-REP; 3:17-cv-00192-REP) Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: January 8, 2018 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carston Carrell Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 4 PER CURIAM: Carston Carrell Woodson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing with prejudice his complaints under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80 (2012), for failure to comply, by a specified deadline, with the court’s orders to pay the filing fees and to file amended complaints in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodson v. United States, Nos. 3:17-cv-00185-REP; 3:17-cv-00186-REP; 3:17-cv-00187-REP; 3:17-cv-00188-REP; 3:17-cv-00189-REP; 3:17-cv-00190-REP; 3:17-cv-00191-REP; 3:17-cv-00192-REP (E.D. Va., July 11, 2017). We grant Woodson leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and deny his motions to deconsolidate his eight nearly identical cases, his motions for default judgment, and his motions to vacate final district court order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 5

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.