Thomas W. Lovegrove v. Brock & Scott, PLLC, No. 17-1615 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1615 THOMAS W. LOVEGROVE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 11, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Terry C. Frank, Benjamin A. Wills, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas W. Lovegrove appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing his complaint asserting claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(e) (2012), and fraud; and (2) denying his motions for reconsideration, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and for leave to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lovegrove v. Brock & Scott, PLLC, No. 2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2017; Apr. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.