Bradley Willis v. Anne Arundel County, No. 17-1438 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1438 BRADLEY WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-01388-JKB) Submitted: November 28, 2017 Decided: December 13, 2017 Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joyce E. Smithey, Reuben W. Wolfson, RIFKIN WEINER LIVINGSTON LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Nancy McCutchan Duden, County Attorney, Kelly C. Lovett, Senior Assistant County Attorney, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bradley Willis appeals the district court’s order granting Anne Arundel County, Maryland, summary judgment on his discriminatory discipline claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017); Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t Title 20 (West 2017); Md. Const. Decl. of Rights, art. 24; and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Willis v. Anne Arundel Cty., Md., No. 1:16-cv01388-JKB (D. Md. March 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.