Ronald Satish Emrit v. Joe Heck, No. 17-1364 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1364 RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CONGRESSMAN JOE HECK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00074-PWG) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 30, 2017 PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for improper venue. On appeal, we limit our review to the issues raised in Emrit’s informal brief. Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed the record in light of these arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v. Heck, No. 8:17-cv-00074-PWG (D. Md. Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.