Michael Sorbello v. Haywood County Municipality, No. 16-7186 (4th Cir. 2016)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7186 MICHAEL ANTHONY SORBELLO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAYWOOD COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; CHARLIE COOK, Public Defender, Individually and in his Official Capacity; M.A. MCABEE, Deputy Sheriff with the Haywood County Sheriff’s Office, Individually and in his Official Capacity; ROB SKIVER, Police Officer with the Waynesville Police Department, Individually and in his Official Capacity; N.C. STATE CRIME LABORATORY, Department of Justice Western; G. BAXTER, Examiner with the N.C. State Crime Laboratory, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-00274-FDW) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Anthony Sorbello, Appellant Pro Se. November 28, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Sorbello appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. confine our brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). brief does review not to the challenge issues the raised in On appeal, we the Appellant’s Because Sorbello’s informal basis for the district court’s disposition, Sorbello has waived appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Sorbello’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.