US v. Julien Dilks, No. 16-7095 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7095 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JULIEN K. DILKS, a/k/a Julien K. Modica, a/k/a Julian Modica, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:93-cr-00091-GEC-RSB-1; 7:16-cv-81163-GEC-RSB) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julien K. Modica, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Julien K. Dilks appeals the district court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as a petition for a writ of error coram nobis and dismissing the previously issued prefiling injunction. record and find no reversible error. petition based upon a We have reviewed the Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dilks, Nos. 7:93-cr-00091- GEC-RSB-1; 7:16-cv-81163-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2016). We also deny Dilks’ motions to make a district court transcript available to this court, to unseal a psychiatric report, to amend/correct his informal brief, and to accelerate case processing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.