Charles Tyson v. Alan Wilson, No. 16-6989 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6989 CHARLES KEVIN BRUCE TYSON, a/k/a Charles Tyson, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ALAN WILSON, Attorney General SC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (6:16-cv-01232-DCN) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles Kevin Bruce Tyson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tyson v. Wilson, No. 6:16-cv-01232-DCN (D.S.C. June 28, 2016). facts prejudice and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.