US v. Manoj Jha, No. 16-6856 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6856 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MANOJ KUMAR JHA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Manoj Kumar Jha, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Manoj Kumar Jha appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial and denying his motion for reconsideration of the order granting the Government an extension of time to file a response. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jha, No. 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1 (D. Md. June 13, 2016). We deny Jha’s motion for sanctions and his motion to vacate this court’s decision in United States v. Jha, 613 F. App’x 212 (4th Cir. 2015) (No. 14-4717). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.