Irma Lanwglois-Roldan v. Jefferson Sessions III, No. 16-2445 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2445 IRMA IVONNE LANWGLOIS-ROLDAN, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 28, 2017 Decided: September 21, 2017 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anna M. Gallagher, MAGGIO & KATTAR, P.C., Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Dawn S. Conrad, Senior Litigation Counsel, Remi Da Rocha-Afodu, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Irma Ivonne Lanwglois-Roldan, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her untimely motion to reopen. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including Lanwglois- Roldan’s supporting evidence and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias– Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Lanwglois-Roldan (B.I.A. Dec. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.