Mayner Pope v. Alicia Guns, No. 16-1729 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1729 MS. MAYNER J. POPE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. ALICIA GUNS, Manager, Member Relations; ALLIANCE, INC.; MR. KENNETH GREGORY GIVENS, AAA CLUB Defendants - Appellees, v. MR. GREG GIVENS, Damage Assessor, Member Relations; AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION MID-ATLANTIC, INC., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-02422-JFM) Submitted: December 20, 2016 Before GREGORY, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: and WYNN, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. and December 22, 2016 FLOYD, Circuit Mayner J. Pope, Appellant Pro Se. OFFICES OF FRANK F. DAILY, PA, Appellees. Frank Furst Daily, III, LAW Hunt Valley, Maryland, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Mayner J. Pope appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Pope cannot prevail on her 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012) claims, as she has failed to provide evidence Pope’s there that state is her law contractual negligence diversity between rights claim, the were impacted. although parties, we it As appears agree with to that the district court’s conclusion that it lacks original jurisdiction based on the amount in controversy. Further, the district court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this claim is within that court’s discretion. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (2012). Accordingly, we deny Pope’s motion to supplement the record and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.