Wellesley Clayton v. M&T Bank, No. 16-1714 (4th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1714 In re: WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON, -----------------------------WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON, Debtor - Appellant, v. M&T BANK, Creditor – Appellee, and A. BURTON SHUFORD, Trustee – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. November 29, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Wellesley K. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. Lacey Meredith Moore, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina; Allen Burton Shuford, Mint Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Wellesley denying K. his Clayton motion appeals for the district reconsideration of court’s order prior order a dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court. have reviewed the record Accordingly, although pauperis, affirm court. we we for and grant the find no reversible leave to proceed reasons stated by error. in the We forma district Clayton v. M&T Bank, Nos. 3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573 (W.D.N.C. appointment May of 24, 2016). counsel and We we deny Clayton’s dispense with motion oral for argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
