Lynton Ballentine v. James B. Nutter & Company, No. 16-1674 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1674 LYNTON BALLENTINE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JAMES B. NUTTER & COMPANY; HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, LP; JONATHAN CALEB ROGERS; SHANN ROSE SCHMIDT; CLAIRE COLLINS; NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY; HOLLY ROBINSON; SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY; KAREN BUMGARDNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00496-FDW-DSC) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Before GREGORY, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: and MOTZ November 21, 2016 and TRAXLER, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lynton Ballentine, Appellant Pro Se. Brian D. BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Lacey HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, Elizabeth C. Stone, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Raleigh, for Appellees. Boone, ALSTON & Meredith Moore, Kacy Lynn Hunt, North Carolina; North Carolina, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lynton Ballentine dismissing his appeals complaint jurisdiction. We reversible error. have the for reviewed district lack the of court’s subject record and order matter find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ballentine v. James B. Nutter & Co., No. 3:15-cv-00496-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2016). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.