Brett Kimberlin v. Hunton & Williams, No. 16-1500 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1500 BRETT KIMBERLIN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP; UNITED STATES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES; BERICO TECHNOLOGIES; MANTECH INTERNATIONAL; HB GARY/FEDERAL; JOHN WOODS; RICHARD WYATT; ROBERT QUACKENBOSS; GREG HOGLUND; AARON BARR; ALEX KARP; MATT LONG; NICHOLAS HALLAM; MATTHEW STECKMAN; PAT RYAN; SAM KREMIN; JOHN DOE Chamber of Commerce Employees; PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY; WILLIAM HOGE; STRATIO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, LLC; BILL NICKLESS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George J. Hazel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-00723-GJH) Submitted: November 30, 2016 Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, December 7, 2016 and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brett Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se. Barrett James Anderson, John J. Buckley, Jr., Craig Darren Singer, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Bobby Roy Burchfield, Nicholas Andrew Oldham, Johnny H. Walker, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Allen M. Gardner, Alexandra P. Shechtel, Jonathan C. Su, LATHAM & WATKINS, Washington, D.C.; Sara A. Solow, LATHAM & WATKINS, New York, New York; Attison Leonard Barnes, III, Mark B. Sweet, Jennifer Stacey Zucker, WILEY REIN, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Daniel Jack Blum, Glenn Marshal Cooper, Patricia Maureen Weaver, PALEY, ROTHMAN & COOPER CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland; Kenneth Bernard Weckstein, BROWN RUDNICK, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Mark Nelson Bartlett, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, Seattle, Washington; Lisa Beth Zycherman, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Aaron Justin Walker, Manassas, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Brett Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order granting the motions to dismiss his civil complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kimberlin v. Hunton & Williams LLP, No. 8:15-cv-00723-GJH (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2016). We deny Kimberlin’s motion to show cause. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.