Momolu V.S. Sirleaf v. David Robinson, No. 15-8022 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-8022 MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, VDOC, sued individually and in official capacity; C. WALL, Chaplin, GraceInside Chaplin Services, Inc., sued individually and in official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, Magistrate Judge. (3:15-cv-00340-MHL-RCY) Submitted: February 5, 2016 Decided: February 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying prejudice. orders his motion for appointment of counsel without This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final of the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Sirleaf seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Sirleaf’s pending motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.