US v. Roderick Whitaker, No. 15-7989 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7989 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RODERICK ARNEZ WHITAKER, a/k/a Snoop, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:09-cr-00125-BR-1) Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Arnez Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Banumathi Rangarajan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roderick Arnez Whitaker appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed Accordingly, we the deny record and Whitaker’s find motion no reversible for error. appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Whitaker, No. 5:09-cr-00125-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2015). facts and legal We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.