Henry Martin, Jr. v. Myecha Miley, No. 15-7726 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7726 HENRY W. MARTIN, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CPT MYECHA MILEY, Defendant – Appellee, and WILLIAM R. BYARS; JOHN R. PATE; ARTHUR A. JORDAN; MCKENNDLY NEWTON; ROBERT E. WARD; JON OZMINT; DENNIS PATTERSON; DANIEL MURPHY; DAVID M. TATARSKY; LT J. CARUJO; LT J. CARTER; ROBERT ORR; LT JAMES RUMP; CAPTAIN E. J. MILLER; DR. THOMAS BYNSE; LT VARLEASE BLACK; CPL L. JENKINS; M. HUDSON; S. SINGLATON, DHO; CPL T. SIMPSON; MR. MCQUEEN; P. SMITH; A. HOLLMAN; HELEN FREEMAN; THOMAS SCOTT; CPT E. JAMES; TANYA A. GEE; V. CLAIRE ALLEN; JOHN C. FEW; WAYNE C. MCCABE; JILL BEATTIE; JEANNETTE MACK; FRANCINE BAUCHMAN; PATTY BRITT POSEY; JAMES S. SLIGH, JR.; DR. ROWLAND; GREGORY S. LINE; CHARLOTTE SMITH; ELLEN GOODWIN; RUSSELL RUSH; JIM CROSBY; SUSAN BARDEN; VIRGINIA CROCKER; PAM SMITH; LAKETA DIKA; DEBORAH B. DURDEN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:13-cv-03516-TMC) Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016 Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Freeman, Sr., GRIFFITH, SHARP & LIIPFERT, LLC, Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Henry W. Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order denying complaint. error. relief on Martin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oct. 8, 2015). Martin v. Miley, No. 6:13-cv-03516-TMC (D.S.C. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.