William Deaton v. Officer John Doe, No. 15-7413 (4th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7413 WILLIAM DEATON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. OFFICER JOHN DOE, a/k/a Officer Thomas; LT JOHN DOE, a/k/a Lt Clauson; LT JOHN DOE, a/k/a Lt Vetter; SGT JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Nurse; JANE DOE, Nurse; SGT JANE DOE; SGT JANE DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE, Nurse; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; LCDC MEDICAL PROVIDER; JOHN DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-00276-GRA-MGB) Submitted: January 19, 2016 Decided: January 29, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Deaton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William dismissing Deaton his 42 appeals U.S.C. the district § 1983 (2012) court’s orders complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order, and denying reconsideration. We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by court. the district have reviewed Deaton v. 2:15-cv-00276-GRA-MGB (D.S.C. dispense argument with contentions are oral adequately the June and Officer John & 24 4, because presented record in Aug. the the facts find no Doe, No. 2015). We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
