US v. Samuel Kelley, Jr., No. 15-7184 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7184 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL LEE KELLEY, JR., a/k/a Little Boot, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (7:10-cr-00099-D-1) Submitted: November 30, 2015 Decided: December 4, 2015 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Lee Kelley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Bradsher, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samuel Lee Kelley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. No. 7:10-cr-00099-D-1 (E.D.N.C. July we affirm for the United States v. Kelley, 9, 2015); see United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 286 (4th Cir. 2013) (finding that Black was not eligible for § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction where he was sentenced to a mandatory minimum because “his sentence was not based Commission on ‘a subsequently sentencing lowered”). range’ We that the dispense Sentencing with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.