Connell Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw, No. 15-6976 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6976 CONNELL D. HAWKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER KINLAW; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER BULLARD; OFFICER J. PRINCE, OFFICER RUSSELL; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03241-F) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Connell D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Connell D. Hawkins appeals his district 42 U.S.C. court’s § 1983 order dismissing without complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. prejudice the (2012) Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015) We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.