Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal, No. 15-6905 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6905 JOSEPH RUHREN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police; LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C.; MELETIS, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Ruhren, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph Ruhren appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruhren v. Spittal, No. 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. May 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.