US v. Robert Ross, No. 15-6846 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6846 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ROBERT KEITH ROSS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Keith Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Keith Ross appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as such. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. States v. (W.D.N.C. Ross, May 11, Nos. 1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 2015). certificate of appealability. We deny Ross’s United 1:09-cv-00365-MR motion for a We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.