US v. Curtis Tinsley, No. 15-6598 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6598 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CURTIS DARYLE TINSLEY, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00009-JLK-2) Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Daryle Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Curtis Daryle Tinsley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tinsley, No. 4:06-cr- 00009-JLK-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.