Jeffrey Cohen v. Rod Rosenstein, No. 15-6193 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on June 25, 2015.

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6193 JEFFREY COHEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROD ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney; HARRY GRUBER, Attorney; JOYCE MCDONALD, Asst. US Attorney, Asst. US Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:15-cv-00263-WDQ) Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 22, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Brian Cohen, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Brian Cohen appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice 1 his civil complaint against federal prosecutors as premature 2 under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915, 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cohen v. Rosenstein, No. 1:15-cv-00263-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 3, 2015). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 1 We have jurisdiction because Cohen cannot cure the defect identified in his complaint by mere amendment. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). 2 See Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 646 (1997); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.