Constance Adamson v. World Government Communist Party, No. 15-2474 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2474 CONSTANCE HAUCK ADAMSON, a/k/a Constance S. Hauck, a/k/a Constance Hauck Adamson, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WORLD GOVERNMENT COMMUNIST PARTY; COMMUNIST PARTY OF WORLD GOVERNMENT; SOCIALIST PARTY OF WORLD GOVERNMENT; WORLD GOVERNMENT ON MY INSURED PROPERTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:15-cv-03497-HMH) Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Constance Hauck Adamson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Constance court’s Hauck order Adamson adopting the seeks to appeal magistrate the judge’s district report and recommendation and dismissing her complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Adamson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.