Lawrence Diggs v. Baltimore County Public Schools, No. 15-2298 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2298 LAWRENCE DIGGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant – Appellee, and BALTIMORE COUNTY; KEVIN KAMENETZ, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00715-RDB) Submitted: May 19, 2016 Decided: June 13, 2016 Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, Andrew G. Scott, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lawrence Diggs appeals the district court’s order granting Baltimore County Public Schools’ motion for summary judgment and closing his civil action that raised claims of employment discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2012). and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. of Baltimore 2015). legal before Cty., No. See Diggs v. Bd. of Educ. 1:14-cv-00715-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 23, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.