In Re: David Smith, No. 15-2222 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2222 In re: DAVID LEE SMITH, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 5:15-ct-03172-FL) Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 23, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Lee Smith, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Smith, a North Carolina inmate, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to construe his previously adjudicated 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as a 28 U.S.C. North § 2241 (2012) Carolina conclude that to petition commute Smith is and his directing sentence entitled not to to the time Governor served. mandamus of We relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. 394, 402 (1976); United Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. States 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). In re The relief sought by Smith is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and all Smith’s pending motions, including motions for release pending appeal and for summary disposition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 2 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.