Cornell Cornish v. Baltimore City, No. 15-1709 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1709 CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BALTIMORE CITY; CITY COUNCIL; MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03117-GLR) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, Appellant Pro Se. Frederic Nelson Smalkin, Jr., Assistant Solicitor, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cornish v. Balt. City, No. 1:14-cv-03117-GLR (D. Md. May 15, 2015, June 26, 2015). We grant Cornish’s motion for leave to file a reply brief exceeding this Court’s length limitations and deny his motion to add copyrighted work to the appeal. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.