Veronique Pongo v. Bank of America, No. 15-1372 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1372 VERONIQUE K. PONGO; FRANCISCO AVOKI, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA; TRUSTEE SERVICE OF CAROLINA; AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; BAC HOME SERVICING; EAGLE, ADJUSTING SERVICE, INC.; DOES I-XX; MERS, INC.; KIMBERLY DAWSON; BEVERLY BROOKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:14-cv-00020-RJC-DSC) Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Veronique K. Pongo; Francisco Avoki, Appellants Pro Se. Kelli A. Burns, Scott I. Perle, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Franklin Lamont Greene, Gregory David Spink, Megan McGee Stacy, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mica Nguyen Worthy, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Veronique K. Pongo and Francisco Avoki appeal the district court’s judge, order accepting dismissing the their recommendation complaint filed of the under magistrate the Truth in Lending Act and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their remaining state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible Appellants to error. proceed in forma pauperis we and grant leave affirm to for the reasons stated by the district court. Pongo v. Bank of Am., No. 3:14-cv-00020-RJC-DSC 31, (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.