US v. Samih Jammal, No. 15-1247 (4th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1247 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMIH FADL JAMMAL, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-07925) Submitted: May 19, 2015 Before KEENAN and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and June 9, 2015 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samih Fadl Weintraub, D.C.; John Charleston, Jammal, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica Dawgert, J. Max UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, Fulton Gianola, Assistant United States Attorney, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samih granting Fadl canceling the Jammal appeals Government’s Jammal’s the motion certificate district for of summary court’s judgment naturalization. We order and have reviewed the record and Jammal’s arguments on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * United States v. Jammal, No. 3:12-cv- 07925 (S.D.W.Va. filed Feb. 9, 2015 & entered Feb. 10, 2015). We deny brief. legal before Jammal’s motion to strike the Government’s response We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED * Because we conclude that the district court correctly determined that the Government was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the ground that Jammal committed unlawful acts that adversely reflected upon his moral character during the required statutory period, we need not reach the district court’s alternate ground that Jammal committed acts constituting a crime involving moral turpitude during the statutory period. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
