Kimberly Spence v. Carl Willis, II, No. 15-1242 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1242 KIMBERLY T. SPENCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CARL J. WILLIS, II, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-cv-00057-BO) Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kimberly T. Spence, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kimberly T. Spence appeals the district court’s order dismissing her petition to remove her state child-custody case to federal court as improperly filed, construing her petition as a complaint, and Feldman * doctrine. dismissing the complaint under the Rooker- On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Spence’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Spence has forfeited appellate review of district transcript the court’s court’s at order. judgment government Accordingly, and deny expense. Spence’s We we affirm motion dispense the for with a oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923) 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.