Catherine Randolph v. US Attorney, No. 15-1094 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1094 CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. ATTORNEY, Technology (Illegal home business), Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cv-00009-CCB) Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we deny Randolph’s motions to amend and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Attorney, No. dispense with contentions 1:15-cv-00009-CCB are oral argument adequately (D. Md. because presented in Randolph v. U.S. Jan. the the 9, facts 2015). We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.