Reine Wodie v. Loretta Lynch, No. 15-1068 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1068 REINE MONIQUE THIEMELE WODIE, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of An Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: September 16, 2015 Decided: September 30, 2015 Before KEENAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Bardavid, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Blair T. O’Connor, Assistant Director, Scott M. Marconda, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reine Monique Thiemele Wodie, a native and citizen of the Ivory Coast, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Immigration Judge’s withholding of Against (Board) denial removal, Torture. We dismissing of and Wodie’s her appeal requests under thoroughly have protection reviewed for of the the asylum, Convention the record, including the transcript of Wodie’s merits hearing, her asylum application, and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and decision. that substantial we deny reasons stated by the Board. legal before supports the Board’s See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, 2014). evidence the petition for review for the See In re: Wodie (B.I.A. Dec. 19, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.