Larry Scott, Jr. v. Major Jones, No. 14-7644 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7644 LARRY W. SCOTT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAJOR JONES; LIEUTENANT CLAWSON; LIEUTENANT MURANT, or Marant; OFFICER GREENE; OFFICER ANDERSON; OFFICER HOPKINS, or Hodges; OFFICER JEFFCOAT; JOHN AND JANE DOES; DR. CHERI, Defendants – Appellees, and OFFICER HODGES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge. (5:13-cv-02870-DCN) Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015 Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry W. Scott, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Justin Tyler Bagwell, William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Larry W. Scott, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed Accordingly, we the deny record leave and no proceed to find in reversible forma We error. pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Jones, No. 5:13-cv-02870-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2014). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.