Johnny Vanover v. Raia Hirsch, No. 14-6765 (4th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6765 JOHNNY M. VANOVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAIA HIRSCH, in their individual and official capacity; JEANETTE W. MCBRIDE, in her individual and official capacity; THEODORE N. LUPTON, in his individual and official capacity; WALTER SHAWN MCDANIEL, in his individual and official capacity; DAVID UNGER, in his individual and official capacity; REYNOLDO CROFY, in his individual and official capacity; RANDY BENSON, in his individual and official capacity; LARRY CRUTCHLOW, in his individual and official capacity; LUIS DIAZ, in his individual and official capacity; JIMMY WILDER, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:14-cv-00277-DCN) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny M. Vanover, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Johnny M. Vanover appeals the district court s order accepting the dismissing complaint confine Vanover s under our brief. recommendation See 28 review 4th 42 U.S.C. U.S.C. to Cir. the R. of the magistrate § 1983 § 1915A(b) issues 34(b). (2012) (2012). raised civil On in Because judge the and rights appeal, we Appellant s Vanover does not challenge the basis for the district court s disposition in his informal briefs, Vanover has forfeited appellate review of the court s order. judgment. legal before Accordingly, we affirm the district court s We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
