Mikeal Stine v. John Doe, No. 14-6160 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6160 MIKEAL STINE; JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiffs Appellants, and ANDREW HOBBS; JERRY BROWN, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE, Special Investigative Agent - FCC Butner; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:13-ct-03279-D) Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mikeal Stine, Jeremy Pinson, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mikeal Stine and Jeremy Pinson appeal the district court s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012) their complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). reviewed the record and find that this appeal is We have frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Stine v. Doe, No. 5:13-ct-03279-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.