Jesse Yates, III v. Julie Garrison, No. 14-2394 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2394 JESSE G. YATES, III; MELISSA LONG YATES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JULIE GARRISON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC) Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se. Richard Caldarone, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and related claims. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yates v. Garrison, No. 5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2014). We deny the Yateses’ motion to strike the informal response brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.