Karen Moore v. Google, Inc., No. 14-2076 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2076 KAREN MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (2:13-cv-03034-RMG) Submitted: March 19, 2015 Decided: April 8, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen Moore, Appellant Pro Se. David Spence Cox, BARNWELL WHALEY PATTERSON & HELMS, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina; Joseph Charles Gratz, DURIE TANGRI LLP, San Francisco, California, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Karen Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint. ∗ civil We reversible error. have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Google, Inc., No. 2:13–cv- 03034–RMG, 2014 WL 4955264 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2014). We deny the pending motion for stay pending appeal and for appointment of counsel as moot. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument Court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ We note that Moore’s notice of appeal designated not only the district court’s final order but also two pretrial orders of the magistrate judge. Because Moore sought review of the orders in the district court, and the district court addressed the issues Moore raises on appeal in its final order, we conclude that we have jurisdiction to review those issues in this appeal. Hoven v. Walgreen Co., 751 F.3d 778, 782 (6th Cir. 2014). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.