Constance Adamson v. Socialist Corporation of KY, No. 14-2028 (4th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2028 CONSTANCE HAUCK ADAMSON, a/k/a Constance S. Hauck, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOCIALIST CORPORATION OF KY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:14-cv-03605-HMH) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014 Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Constance Hauck Adamson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Constance Hauck Adamson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice. * The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. recommended failure § 636(b)(1)(B) that to relief file be (2012). denied timely, The and magistrate advised specific judge Adamson objections that to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The magistrate timely judge’s filing of recommendation specific is objections necessary to to a preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have noncompliance. Cir. 1985); been warned of the consequences of Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Adamson has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately * presented in the materials The district court’s order is final and appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). 2 before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
